Manager Oversight

Streamlined manager monitoring for asset owners.

Track voting, engagement, and stewardship performance across all your managers, with standardised data, automated oversight, and clear reporting.

monitoring.impactive.pro/owner
Overview
Manager scorecard
Engagement view
Voting record
Policy alignment
Reporting cycles
Alerts
Manager scorecard · Q1 2026
5 managers · Last refreshed 09 May 2026
Q1 2026 ▾
94%
Reports received
+6% vs Q4
87%
Policy aligned
+2% vs Q4
312
Engagements logged
+41 vs Q4
3
Open issues
2 escalated
Manager
Reporting
Policy fit
Engagement
Score
Asset Manager A
On time Aligned 142 logged
92
Asset Manager B
On time Aligned 88 logged
88
Asset Manager C
Late Aligned 52 logged
74
Asset Manager D
On time Partial 21 logged
68
Asset Manager E
Missing Partial 9 logged
54
Monitor every manager

Every manager's stewardship, in one view.

See how external managers are exercising stewardship across your portfolios: proxy voting, engagement, escalation, and outcomes, side by side.

Proxy voting activity

Every vote cast by every manager, across every holding.

Company engagements

Who each manager is engaging, on what, and how often.

Escalation actions

Where managers have escalated, and what followed.

Climate stewardship

Climate objectives, targets and transition engagement.

Governance concerns

Board composition, remuneration and audit issues raised.

Stewardship outcomes

What actually changed at the company as a result.

Manager scorecard
Q1 2026 · 5 managers
ManagerReportingPolicy fitScore
Manager A
On time Aligned
92
Manager B
On time Aligned
88
Manager C
Late 8d Aligned
74
Manager D
On time Partial
68
Manager E
Missing Partial
54
Standardise reporting

Compare managers like for like, at last.

Managers use different formats, frameworks, and definitions. We standardise them automatically, so your team can compare across mandates and portfolios.

Stewardship reports

Any format, ingested and mapped to one structure.

Voting disclosures

Normalised to a common resolution taxonomy.

Engagement records

Consistent fields for company, theme and objective.

ESG & climate data

Aligned definitions so metrics compare cleanly.

Document standardisation
Q1 2026 · 12 sources
MgrA_Q1_Stewardship.pdf
PDF · 38 pages · 142 engagements extracted
Standardised
MgrB_Voting_2026Q1.xlsx
Excel · 2,140 rows · 88 engagements extracted
Standardised
MgrC_ESG_Brief.docx
Word · 12 pages · 52 engagements extracted
Standardised
MgrD_Investment_Stewardship.csv
CSV · 980 rows · 21 engagements extracted
Review
Proxy voting at scale

From manual review to continuous oversight.

Track every vote across every manager and holding. Surface divergence from your policy as it happens, not at quarter end.

Votes against your policy

Flagged as they are disclosed, with manager rationale.

Inconsistent voting

Where a manager votes both ways on the same issue.

Climate & governance exceptions

Resolutions on your priority themes, surfaced first.

High-risk resolutions

Contested items at your largest holdings.

Divergence across managers

Where managers split on the same resolution.

Proxy voting monitor
Live · 2,847 votes tracked
Active voting policies
✓Vote AGAINST executive pay above £8m without TSR linkage
✓Vote FOR shareholder climate proposals at Scope 1+2 emitters
✓Vote AGAINST any director with >4 board seats
Live divergence
!
Manager D voted FOR Resolution 7.4
Divergence from your remuneration policy. Manager rationale logged for quarterly review.
Detected 09 May 2026 · Source: MgrD_Q1_Voting.pdf p.12
Engagement quality

Go beyond engagement counts.

See which engagements are driving change, and which are not. Track objectives, escalation, and real-world outcomes, not just activity volumes.

Companies being engaged

Coverage across your holdings, not just headline counts.

Objectives set

What each manager is actually asking the company to do.

Escalation activity

Whether managers escalate when progress stalls.

Outcomes achieved

Evidence of change, linked back to the engagement.

Engagement tracker
Q1 2026 · 312 engagements
Company · ThemeStageOutcomeTrack
Shell · Climate transition
Engaged Achieved
90
BP · Methane disclosure
Escalated Partial
62
HSBC · Board diversity
Engaged Achieved
85
Glencore · Coal phase-out
Stalled None
28
Surface risks automatically

Spot what matters, when it matters.

The platform continuously flags the things you'd otherwise have to dig for. Your team intervenes where it counts.

Policy misalignment

Voting or engagement that runs against your policy.

Weak escalation activity

Long-running objectives with no escalation behind them.

Potential greenwashing

Claims in reporting unsupported by the underlying record.

Voting inconsistencies

Patterns that contradict a manager's stated approach.

Stewardship gaps

Material holdings with little or no activity logged.

Risk flags
Active · 7 surfaced this week
!
Possible greenwashing · Manager E Q1 report
Climate engagement claims unsupported by specific outcomes or escalation evidence. Recommend review before trustee meeting.
Flagged 06 May 2026 · Source: MgrE_ESG_Q1.pdf p.5
!
Weak escalation · Manager C, 4 holdings
Engagements logged without escalation despite missed objectives across two consecutive periods.
Flagged 03 May 2026 · Cross-reference 4 holdings
Board-ready reporting

Audit-ready evidence, at the click of a button.

Generate clear reporting for trustees, investment committees, regulators, and stewardship disclosures, with transparent evidence and full oversight records.

Trustees

Plain-language summaries of how each manager is performing.

Investment committees

Comparative scorecards with drill-down to the evidence.

Regulators

Stewardship Code and SDR-ready submissions.

Stewardship disclosures

Public reporting built from the underlying record.

Reports & exports
Q1 2026 · 4 ready
UK Stewardship Code 2026 Annual Report
Generated · 42 pages · 312 citations
Download
SDR Disclosure · Q1 2026
Generated · 18 pages · Drawn from 5 managers
Download
Trustee Quarterly Pack · March 2026
Generated · 22 pages · Including divergence log
Download
Member & Beneficiary Update
Generated · 6 pages · Plain-language summary
Download
Who it's for & what's inside

Purpose-built for asset-owner stewardship oversight.

Designed around how asset-owner stewardship teams actually work.

Built for institutional investors

Whether you oversee 5 managers or 50.

Asset owners use Manager Monitoring to scale oversight efficiently across asset classes, jurisdictions, and reporting frameworks.

  • Pension schemes
  • Sovereign wealth funds
  • Insurance investors
  • Endowments & foundations
  • OCIOs & investment consultants
Key capabilities

Everything you need in one platform.

Leave manual spreadsheet work behind: everything you need for asset-owner stewardship oversight, in one platform.

  • Proxy voting analytics
  • Engagement monitoring
  • Climate stewardship tracking
  • Policy alignment monitoring
  • Automated risk flagging
  • AI-powered document analysis
  • Audit trails & governance workflows
  • Benchmarking & reporting
How it works

From scattered reporting to active oversight, in four steps.

You set the standard. Managers upload what they already have. AI does the structuring. The full picture comes back to you.

01
Asset Owner

Set the standard

Upload your stewardship policy, voting guidelines, and KPI framework. Managers see them on login, with deadlines attached.

02
Asset Manager

Upload what you have

Managers drag and drop the reports they already produce: PDF, Excel, CSV, Word. No reformatting required.

03
AI

Structure automatically

AI reads each document, extracts the data, and maps it to your framework. Gaps and inconsistencies flagged.

04
Asset Owner

See the full picture

Validated, standardised data lands in your dashboard, ready to interrogate, evidence, and export.